State Government rep by The Inspector of Police, T5 Thiruverkadu Police Station vs Lal @ Prakash — 23/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/s 147, 148, 341, 302, r/w 149. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTR090001042021
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
23/2021
Filing Date
23-01-2021
Registration No
23/2021
Registration Date
23-01-2021
Court
III. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
FIR Details
FIR Number
909
Police Station
Thiruverkadu. P.S.
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government rep by The Inspector of Police, T5 Thiruverkadu Police Station
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
Lal @ Prakash
Akashkumar @ Kattappa
Kathavarayan
Gunasekara Pandian @ gullu
Senthilkumar @ Senthil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District and Sessions Judge - III
Evidence
Orders
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: S.C. No. 23/2021 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The five accused persons (Lal @ Prakash, Akash Kumar, Kathavarayan, Gullu @ Gunasekara Pandiyan, and Senthil Kumar) filed a petition under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to recall witness PW16 (Sadam Usain @ Ashwin) for further cross-examination. The accused claimed their counsel had left some questions unasked during the witness's examination on 27.11.2025. The court rejected this request, finding that merely leaving some questions unanswered was not an acceptable reason under Section 311 Cr.P.C., which requires the witness's evidence to be "essential to the just decision of the case." Applying Supreme Court guidelines, the court dismissed the petition, citing concerns about trial delay (the case had been pending five years) and preventing abuse of judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C. No. 23/2021 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The five accused persons (Lal @ Prakash, Akash Kumar, Kathavarayan, Gullu @ Gunasekara Pandiyan, and Senthil Kumar) filed a petition under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to recall witness PW16 (Sadam Usain @ Ashwin) for further cross-examination. The accused claimed their counsel had left some questions unasked during the witness's examination on 27.11.2025. The court rejected this request, finding that merely leaving some questions unanswered was not an acceptable reason under Section 311 Cr.P.C., which requires the witness's evidence to be "essential to the just decision of the case." Applying Supreme Court guidelines, the court dismissed the petition, citing concerns about trial delay (the case had been pending five years) and preventing abuse of judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts