Geetha vs Sekar and another — 450/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(ii). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTR080008182023

Filing Number

438/2023

Filing Date

14-Sep-2023

Registration No

450/2023

Registration Date

22-Sep-2023

Court

II. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee

Judge

1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Geetha

    Adv. A. Naveen Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sekar and another

  2. 2.Vijayalakshmi

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: Case 450/2023 - Geetha v. Sekar and Vijayalakshmi This is a civil property dispute heard at the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur. On 22.01.2026, the court recorded the deposition of Geetha (PW1/Plaintiff), who testified regarding property ownership claims involving land and a house. The witness's cross-examination revealed disputes over the extent of property (contradictions between 3 acres and 2 acres mentioned), the nature of title documents, and the chain of ownership relating to her father's property and a 1961 settlement. The document reflects an ongoing evidentiary stage with the witness's testimony being recorded and cross-examined regarding conflicting statements about property details and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 12-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  11. 15-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 15-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  13. 10-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  14. 16-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  15. 18-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  16. 13-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  17. 13-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  18. 06-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  19. 19-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  20. 17-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  21. 22-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  22. 25-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  23. 26-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  24. 26-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  25. 19-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  26. 12-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

  27. 12-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 14-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 450/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 450/2023 - Geetha v. Sekar and Vijayalakshmi This is a civil property dispute heard at the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur. On 22.01.2026, the court recorded the deposition of Geetha (PW1/Plaintiff), who testified regarding property ownership claims involving land and a house. The witness's cross-examination revealed disputes over the extent of property (contradictions between 3 acres and 2 acres mentioned), the nature of title documents, and the chain of ownership relating to her father's property and a 1961 settlement. The document reflects an ongoing evidentiary stage with the witness's testimony being recorded and cross-examined regarding conflicting statements about property details and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case