Geetha vs Sekar and another — 450/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(ii). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTR080008182023

Evidence

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

438/2023

Filing Date

14-09-2023

Registration No

450/2023

Registration Date

22-09-2023

Court

II. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee

Judge

1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(ii)

Petitioner(s)

Geetha

Adv. A. Naveen Kumar

Respondent(s)

Sekar and another

Vijayalakshmi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

09-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Trial

26-02-2026

Trial

12-02-2026

Trial

22-01-2026

Trial

Interim Orders

22-01-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: Case 450/2023 - Geetha v. Sekar and Vijayalakshmi This is a civil property dispute heard at the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur. On 22.01.2026, the court recorded the deposition of Geetha (PW1/Plaintiff), who testified regarding property ownership claims involving land and a house. The witness's cross-examination revealed disputes over the extent of property (contradictions between 3 acres and 2 acres mentioned), the nature of title documents, and the chain of ownership relating to her father's property and a 1961 settlement. The document reflects an ongoing evidentiary stage with the witness's testimony being recorded and cross-examined regarding conflicting statements about property details and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 450/2023 - Geetha v. Sekar and Vijayalakshmi This is a civil property dispute heard at the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur. On 22.01.2026, the court recorded the deposition of Geetha (PW1/Plaintiff), who testified regarding property ownership claims involving land and a house. The witness's cross-examination revealed disputes over the extent of property (contradictions between 3 acres and 2 acres mentioned), the nature of title documents, and the chain of ownership relating to her father's property and a 1961 settlement. The document reflects an ongoing evidentiary stage with the witness's testimony being recorded and cross-examined regarding conflicting statements about property details and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case