Geetha vs Sekar and another — 450/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(ii). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR080008182023
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
438/2023
Filing Date
14-09-2023
Registration No
450/2023
Registration Date
22-09-2023
Court
II. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Geetha
Adv. A. Naveen Kumar
Respondent(s)
Sekar and another
Vijayalakshmi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
Evidence
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 26-02-2026 | Trial |
| 12-02-2026 | Trial |
| 22-01-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary: Case 450/2023 - Geetha v. Sekar and Vijayalakshmi This is a civil property dispute heard at the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur. On 22.01.2026, the court recorded the deposition of Geetha (PW1/Plaintiff), who testified regarding property ownership claims involving land and a house. The witness's cross-examination revealed disputes over the extent of property (contradictions between 3 acres and 2 acres mentioned), the nature of title documents, and the chain of ownership relating to her father's property and a 1961 settlement. The document reflects an ongoing evidentiary stage with the witness's testimony being recorded and cross-examined regarding conflicting statements about property details and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 450/2023 - Geetha v. Sekar and Vijayalakshmi This is a civil property dispute heard at the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur. On 22.01.2026, the court recorded the deposition of Geetha (PW1/Plaintiff), who testified regarding property ownership claims involving land and a house. The witness's cross-examination revealed disputes over the extent of property (contradictions between 3 acres and 2 acres mentioned), the nature of title documents, and the chain of ownership relating to her father's property and a 1961 settlement. The document reflects an ongoing evidentiary stage with the witness's testimony being recorded and cross-examined regarding conflicting statements about property details and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts