Santha Kumari and 2 others vs Malliga and 7 others — 570/2022
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2),25(d),27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR080006102022
Filing Number
388/2022
Filing Date
23-Nov-2022
Registration No
570/2022
Registration Date
23-Nov-2022
Court
II. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Santha Kumari and 2 others
Adv. P.Raja
-
2.Lisha Priya
Adv. P.Raja
-
3.L.Sali Dhinakaran
Adv. P.Raja
Respondent(s)
-
1.Malliga and 7 others
-
2.P.Muthu
-
3.P.Devi
-
4.P.Jayalakshmi
-
5.P.Panaiyan
-
6.Kumaravathy
-
7.The Sub Register, Poonamallee
-
8.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: 570/2022 The petition filed by Malliga (first respondent/defendant) seeking to amend the plaint in an ongoing partition suit was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to provide supporting documentary evidence for her claims and that the respondents (Santha Kumari, Lisha Priya, and L. Sali Dhinakaran) adequately opposed the amendment, establishing that no new property should be added to the partition case without proper substantiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
18-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
22-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
09-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
11-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
10-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
08-Aug-2025
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
16-Jul-2025
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
17-Jun-2025
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
13-Mar-2025
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
20-Feb-2025
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
08-Jan-2025
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
05-Dec-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
11-Nov-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
21-Sep-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
28-Aug-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
05-Jul-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
18-Jun-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
07-Jun-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
03-Feb-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
04-Jan-2024
Issues
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
03-Nov-2023
Issues
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
14-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
04-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
20-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
19-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
07-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
25-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
15-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
06-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 570/2022
CASE SUMMARY: 570/2022 The petition filed by Malliga (first respondent/defendant) seeking to amend the plaint in an ongoing partition suit was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to provide supporting documentary evidence for her claims and that the respondents (Santha Kumari, Lisha Priya, and L. Sali Dhinakaran) adequately opposed the amendment, establishing that no new property should be added to the partition case without proper substantiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts