Minor .M.Sarath Kumar vs The United India Ins. Ltd. Advocate - R.K.Sethuraman — 305/2015
Case under --- Section 166ofMVActandRule3. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTR080003562015
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Date
10-10-2015
Registration No
305/2015
Registration Date
29-06-2016
Court
II. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Minor .M.Sarath Kumar
Adv. D.Sathyasri
Respondent(s)
The United India Ins. Ltd. Advocate - R.K.Sethuraman
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 03-02-2026 | Await Reports |
| 06-01-2026 | Await Reports |
| 25-11-2025 | Await Reports |
| 11-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed — The Additional District Judge (Motor Vehicles) of Tiruvallur has allowed the petitioner's applications (I.M. Nos. 1 & 2/2025) to reopen evidence and recall the petitioner as a witness in the motor vehicle accident compensation case (MCOP No. 305/2015). The court permitted this because the petitioner had not produced a disability certificate earlier, which is now essential for the case. However, no interest will be awarded for the period of delay caused by the petitioner's own default (post-07.03.2018). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed — The Additional District Judge (Motor Vehicles) of Tiruvallur has allowed the petitioner's applications (I.M. Nos. 1 & 2/2025) to reopen evidence and recall the petitioner as a witness in the motor vehicle accident compensation case (MCOP No. 305/2015). The court permitted this because the petitioner had not produced a disability certificate earlier, which is now essential for the case. However, no interest will be awarded for the period of delay caused by the petitioner's own default (post-07.03.2018). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts