P R Sivashankar vs Shiksha Financial Services India Ltd, Rep by S.suresh Kumar — 17/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 30th March 2026.

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNTR080000942024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-02-2024

Filing Number

5/2024

Filing Date

07-02-2024

Registration No

17/2024

Registration Date

07-02-2024

Court

II. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee

Judge

1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

P R Sivashankar

Adv. Jagath Ratchagan Jayaraman

Respondent(s)

Shiksha Financial Services India Ltd, Rep by S.suresh Kumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II

30-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Judgement

12-03-2026

Arguments

19-02-2026

Arguments

15-12-2025

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Criminal Appeal No. 17/2024 The Court allowed the appeal and acquitted P.R. Sivashankar of cheque bouncing charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Although the trial court had convicted him and sentenced one month imprisonment plus ₹50 lakh compensation, both parties filed a settlement petition during appeal proceedings; the accused paid ₹50 lakh in full and final settlement, and the complainant endorsed no objection. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court held that compounded offences under Section 147 of the NI Act must result in acquittal, thereby setting aside the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Criminal Appeal No. 17/2024 The Court allowed the appeal and acquitted P.R. Sivashankar of cheque bouncing charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Although the trial court had convicted him and sentenced one month imprisonment plus ₹50 lakh compensation, both parties filed a settlement petition during appeal proceedings; the accused paid ₹50 lakh in full and final settlement, and the complainant endorsed no objection. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court held that compounded offences under Section 147 of the NI Act must result in acquittal, thereby setting aside the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

II. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case