K. Chellaiah vs Palani Advocate - E.T. Nandakumaran — 5303/2025
Case under Limitationact Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 18th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010110082025
Filing Number
6977/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
5303/2025
Registration Date
17-12-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K. Chellaiah
Adv. D. Raja
Respondent(s)
Palani Advocate - E.T. Nandakumaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Counter
Counter
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Orders |
| 12-03-2026 | Counter |
| 25-02-2026 | Counter |
| 07-02-2026 | Counter |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 5303/2025 The court allowed K. Chellaiah's petition to condone an 18-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction for a Negotiable Instruments Act offense. The trial court had sentenced him to one year imprisonment and ordered Rs. 2,00,000 compensation. Finding the petitioner's reasons—poor health and financial constraints—probable and uncontroverted, the court held that the delay's cause, rather than its length, was dispositive, and that condonation would serve substantial justice without prejudicing the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 5303/2025 The court allowed K. Chellaiah's petition to condone an 18-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction for a Negotiable Instruments Act offense. The trial court had sentenced him to one year imprisonment and ordered Rs. 2,00,000 compensation. Finding the petitioner's reasons—poor health and financial constraints—probable and uncontroverted, the court held that the delay's cause, rather than its length, was dispositive, and that condonation would serve substantial justice without prejudicing the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts