K. Chellaiah vs Palani Advocate - E.T. Nandakumaran — 5303/2025
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 18th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010110082025
Filing Number
6977/2025
Filing Date
17-Dec-2025
Registration No
5303/2025
Registration Date
17-Dec-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K. Chellaiah
Adv. D. Raja
Respondent(s)
-
1.Palani Advocate - E.T. Nandakumaran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 5303/2025 The court allowed K. Chellaiah's petition to condone an 18-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction for a Negotiable Instruments Act offense. The trial court had sentenced him to one year imprisonment and ordered Rs. 2,00,000 compensation. Finding the petitioner's reasons—poor health and financial constraints—probable and uncontroverted, the court held that the delay's cause, rather than its length, was dispositive, and that condonation would serve substantial justice without prejudicing the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Counter
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Counter
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Counter
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Counter
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 5303/2025
Summary of Case 5303/2025 The court allowed K. Chellaiah's petition to condone an 18-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction for a Negotiable Instruments Act offense. The trial court had sentenced him to one year imprisonment and ordered Rs. 2,00,000 compensation. Finding the petitioner's reasons—poor health and financial constraints—probable and uncontroverted, the court held that the delay's cause, rather than its length, was dispositive, and that condonation would serve substantial justice without prejudicing the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts