K. Chellaiah vs Palani Advocate - E.T. Nandakumaran — 5302/2025
Case under Limitationact Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 18th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010110072025
Filing Number
6976/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
5302/2025
Registration Date
17-12-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K. Chellaiah
Adv. D. Raja
Respondent(s)
Palani Advocate - E.T. Nandakumaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Counter
Counter
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Orders |
| 12-03-2026 | Counter |
| 25-02-2026 | Counter |
| 07-02-2026 | Counter |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: K. Chellaiah v. Palani Advocate (CMP 5302/2025) The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur allowed K. Chellaiah's petition to condone an 18-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the petitioner's reasons—poor health and financial constraints preventing him from engaging counsel—constituted sufficient cause for the delay, citing the principle that "sufficient cause" should receive liberal construction to advance substantial justice where no gross negligence or bad faith is shown. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: K. Chellaiah v. Palani Advocate (CMP 5302/2025) The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur allowed K. Chellaiah's petition to condone an 18-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the petitioner's reasons—poor health and financial constraints preventing him from engaging counsel—constituted sufficient cause for the delay, citing the principle that "sufficient cause" should receive liberal construction to advance substantial justice where no gross negligence or bad faith is shown. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts