Kannan vs Kaleeswari — 5263/2025
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010108042025
Filing Number
6894/2025
Filing Date
16-Dec-2025
Registration No
5263/2025
Registration Date
16-Dec-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kannan
Adv. M. Anbalagan
-
2.Kanaka Sabapathy
-
3.Mariyammal
-
4.Padmavathy
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kaleeswari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Summary The Principal District Judge at Tiruvallur allowed a petition to condone a 355-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against a domestic violence order that had directed the petitioner to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 3,500 and compensation of Rs. 3,00,000. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that family hardship—caring for his paralyzed father—prevented timely appeal filing, finding no prejudice to the respondent since the matter would be decided on merits. The petition was granted conditionally upon payment of Rs. 2,500 costs to the District Mediation Centre. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 5263/2025
Court Summary The Principal District Judge at Tiruvallur allowed a petition to condone a 355-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against a domestic violence order that had directed the petitioner to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 3,500 and compensation of Rs. 3,00,000. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that family hardship—caring for his paralyzed father—prevented timely appeal filing, finding no prejudice to the respondent since the matter would be decided on merits. The petition was granted conditionally upon payment of Rs. 2,500 costs to the District Mediation Centre. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts