R. Rajendran vs K. Sakthivel — 93/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--Made Over on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNTR010092762025

e-Filing Number

25-10-2025

Filing Number

5952/2025

Filing Date

29-Oct-2025

Registration No

93/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Made Over

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3)(a)

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

1.R. Rajendran

Adv. D.VELU

Respondent(s)

1.K. Sakthivel

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
08-Apr-2026

Copy of OrderView PDF

Case 93/2026 Summary: The court suspended R. Rajendran's one-year imprisonment sentence (imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act) pending criminal appeal, finding exceptional circumstances warranting reduced statutory deposit. Instead of the standard 20% deposit on Rs. 8,50,000 compensation, the court directed 10% deposit within 60 days, accepting Rajendran's claim that the cheque was issued for security purposes only with no legally enforceable debt, and enlarged him on bail with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
08-Apr-2026

Appearance

Principal District and Sessions Judge
08-Apr-2026

Disposed

Principal District and Sessions Judge
27-Mar-2026

Appearance

Principal District and Sessions Judge
18-Mar-2026

Appearance

Principal District and Sessions Judge
12-Mar-2026

Appearance

Principal District and Sessions Judge
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
29-Oct-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 93/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 93/2026 Summary: The court suspended R. Rajendran's one-year imprisonment sentence (imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act) pending criminal appeal, finding exceptional circumstances warranting reduced statutory deposit. Instead of the standard 20% deposit on Rs. 8,50,000 compensation, the court directed 10% deposit within 60 days, accepting Rajendran's claim that the cheque was issued for security purposes only with no legally enforceable debt, and enlarged him on bail with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.