The Inspector of Police, T-9, Pattabiram Police Station. vs Karikalan @ Micheal and 3 others — 309/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341, 294(b), 332, 353 IPC. r/w 34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th April 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNTR010076902024

Case disposed

Filing Number

5910/2024

Filing Date

28-08-2024

Registration No

309/2024

Registration Date

28-08-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

3-I Additional District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

733

Police Station

Pattabiram Police Station

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341, 294(b), 332, 353 IPC. r/w 34
Tn Public Property (Prvnt.of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 Section 3(1)

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police, T-9, Pattabiram Police Station.

Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

Karikalan @ Micheal and 3 others

Karthikeyan @ Karthi

Lokesh

Vasanthakumar @ Settu

Hearing History

Judge: 3-I Additional District and Sessions Judge

17-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Judgement

11-03-2026

Judgement

07-03-2026

Evidence

03-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Judgment Summary The I-Additional District and Sessions Judge in Tiruvallur acquitted all four accused of charges including wrongful restraint, obscene language, deterring public servants, voluntarily causing hurt, and property damage. The court found the prosecution's case fundamentally weak due to contradictory witness testimonies, the complainant turning hostile, absence of independent witnesses, and failure to definitively establish the accused's involvement in the alleged June 2018 bus incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The I-Additional District and Sessions Judge in Tiruvallur acquitted all four accused of charges including wrongful restraint, obscene language, deterring public servants, voluntarily causing hurt, and property damage. The court found the prosecution's case fundamentally weak due to contradictory witness testimonies, the complainant turning hostile, absence of independent witnesses, and failure to definitively establish the accused's involvement in the alleged June 2018 bus incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case