S.John Rathinam vs A.Selvamathi Advocate - S. Madhankumar — 383/2022

Case under Indiandivorceact Section 10(1)(1). Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNTR010069232022

Mediation

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

Filing Number

2455/2022

Filing Date

28-10-2022

Registration No

383/2022

Registration Date

16-11-2022

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

IndianDivorceAct Section 10(1)(1)
IA/2/2026 Classification : Others Section S.John RathinamA.Selvamathi

Petitioner(s)

S.John Rathinam

Adv. N.Beulah John Selvaraj

Respondent(s)

A.Selvamathi Advocate - S. Madhankumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

18-04-2026

Mediation

10-04-2026

Enquiry

06-04-2026

Enquiry

27-03-2026

Enquiry

18-03-2026

Enquiry

Interim Orders

20-09-2025
Copy of Order

Summary The petition for interim maintenance under Section 36 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869 is partly allowed. The court directed the respondent (husband) to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month to the petitioner (wife) and Rs. 3,500/- each per month to their two minor children (ages 9 and 10) for maintenance until disposal of the main divorce case, plus Rs. 10,000/- toward litigation expenses. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for Rs. 20,000/- and Rs. 10,000/- per child, finding the respondent's actual income to be Rs. 32,000/- per month (not the claimed Rs. 3 lakhs) based on salary certificates and bank statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition for interim maintenance under Section 36 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869 is partly allowed. The court directed the respondent (husband) to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month to the petitioner (wife) and Rs. 3,500/- each per month to their two minor children (ages 9 and 10) for maintenance until disposal of the main divorce case, plus Rs. 10,000/- toward litigation expenses. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for Rs. 20,000/- and Rs. 10,000/- per child, finding the respondent's actual income to be Rs. 32,000/- per month (not the claimed Rs. 3 lakhs) based on salary certificates and bank statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case