Vethairuthayavencia and another vs Nil — 348/2025

Case under Indian Divorce Act Section 10(A). Disposed: Contested--Mutual Consent on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNTR010066472025

Filing Number

2821/2025

Filing Date

05-Aug-2025

Registration No

348/2025

Registration Date

08-Sep-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Mutual Consent

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Divorce Act Section 10(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vethairuthayavencia and another

    Adv. M.Ulaganathan

  2. 2.Naveen A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District Judge at Tiruvallur granted a mutual consent divorce petition filed by the petitioners under Section 10(A) of the Indian Divorce Act, dissolving their Christian marriage solemnized on 15.09.2016. The court found that the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to misunderstandings between the parties, who had been living separately since 2023, with no possibility of reunion despite reconciliation efforts by family elders, and that the mandatory 6-month waiting period had elapsed with no change in circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 08-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 348/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District Judge at Tiruvallur granted a mutual consent divorce petition filed by the petitioners under Section 10(A) of the Indian Divorce Act, dissolving their Christian marriage solemnized on 15.09.2016. The court found that the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to misunderstandings between the parties, who had been living separately since 2023, with no possibility of reunion despite reconciliation efforts by family elders, and that the mandatory 6-month waiting period had elapsed with no change in circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case