Surliyammal vs Sekar Advocate - T.Arivarasan — 152/2024
Case under Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 Section 25. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTR010049082024
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
e-Filing Number
12-06-2024
Filing Number
1420/2024
Filing Date
13-06-2024
Registration No
152/2024
Registration Date
13-06-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Surliyammal
Adv. G. Dharoga, A. Dhanraj
Respondent(s)
Sekar Advocate - T.Arivarasan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Enquiry |
| 10-04-2026 | Enquiry |
| 26-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 12-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 04-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 152/2024 - Surliyammal v. Sekar The Principal District Judge of Tiruvallur partly allowed the petition filed by maternal grandmother Surliyammal seeking visitation rights to her minor grandson S. Magizharasan (age 5). The court granted visitation rights on the first Saturday once every two months (2:30 PM to 5:00 PM) at the District Legal Services Authority office, in the presence of the respondent/father and the DLSA Secretary. The court rejected the grandmother's request for weekly visits (Fridays and Saturdays) considering the father's employment obligations and the child's best interests, though the child expressed willingness to meet his grandmother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 152/2024 - Surliyammal v. Sekar The Principal District Judge of Tiruvallur partly allowed the petition filed by maternal grandmother Surliyammal seeking visitation rights to her minor grandson S. Magizharasan (age 5). The court granted visitation rights on the first Saturday once every two months (2:30 PM to 5:00 PM) at the District Legal Services Authority office, in the presence of the respondent/father and the DLSA Secretary. The court rejected the grandmother's request for weekly visits (Fridays and Saturdays) considering the father's employment obligations and the child's best interests, though the child expressed willingness to meet his grandmother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts