Surliyammal vs Sekar Advocate - T.Arivarasan — 152/2024

Case under Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 Section 25. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNTR010049082024

Enquiry

Next Hearing

03rd July 2026

e-Filing Number

12-06-2024

Filing Number

1420/2024

Filing Date

13-06-2024

Registration No

152/2024

Registration Date

13-06-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

GUARDIANS & WARDS ACT, 1890 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

Surliyammal

Adv. G. Dharoga, A. Dhanraj

Respondent(s)

Sekar Advocate - T.Arivarasan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

30-04-2026

Enquiry

10-04-2026

Enquiry

26-03-2026

Enquiry

12-03-2026

Enquiry

04-02-2026

Enquiry

Interim Orders

10-04-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: 152/2024 - Surliyammal v. Sekar The Principal District Judge of Tiruvallur partly allowed the petition filed by maternal grandmother Surliyammal seeking visitation rights to her minor grandson S. Magizharasan (age 5). The court granted visitation rights on the first Saturday once every two months (2:30 PM to 5:00 PM) at the District Legal Services Authority office, in the presence of the respondent/father and the DLSA Secretary. The court rejected the grandmother's request for weekly visits (Fridays and Saturdays) considering the father's employment obligations and the child's best interests, though the child expressed willingness to meet his grandmother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 152/2024 - Surliyammal v. Sekar The Principal District Judge of Tiruvallur partly allowed the petition filed by maternal grandmother Surliyammal seeking visitation rights to her minor grandson S. Magizharasan (age 5). The court granted visitation rights on the first Saturday once every two months (2:30 PM to 5:00 PM) at the District Legal Services Authority office, in the presence of the respondent/father and the DLSA Secretary. The court rejected the grandmother's request for weekly visits (Fridays and Saturdays) considering the father's employment obligations and the child's best interests, though the child expressed willingness to meet his grandmother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case