S.Jagadeesan and another vs P.G.Prabakar Reddy( Managing Director of P.G. Construction Pvt. Ltd.,) and 3 others. — 93/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c),42(a). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTR010047642023

Filing Number

1626/2023

Filing Date

30-Jun-2023

Registration No

93/2024

Registration Date

28-Feb-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c),42(a)
Ia/8/2026 Classification : Others Section S.Jagadeesan and anotherP.G.Prabakar Reddy( Managing Director of P.G. Construction Pvt. Ltd.,) and 3 others
Ia/9/2026 Classification : Petition to Reject the Plaint Section S.Jagadeesan and anotherThe Sub Registrar

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Jagadeesan and another

    Adv. R.E.Elavarasu

  2. 2.K.Mani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.G.Prabakar Reddy( Managing Director of P.G. Construction Pvt. Ltd.,) and 3 others.

  2. 2.The Sub Registrar

  3. 3.The District Registrar

  4. 4.The District Collector

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The petition filed by P Dot G Constructions Private Limited (represented by its Director Mohan Srinivasan) to be impleaded as the 5th defendant in Commercial Original Suit No.93/2024 was allowed. The court found the petitioner to be a necessary party since the company P Dot G underwent insolvency proceedings and was taken over by RCC e-Construct Private Limited, with the petitioner being the authorized signatory per the board resolution dated 16.09.2020. The court determined that impleading the petitioner would not prejudice the plaintiffs and would serve the interests of justice and proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 26-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  12. 11-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  13. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  14. 25-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  15. 17-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  16. 21-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  17. 17-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  18. 13-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  19. 23-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  20. 10-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  21. 02-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  22. 09-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  23. 18-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  24. 24-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  25. 21-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  26. 26-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  27. 07-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  28. 08-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  29. 21-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  30. 21-Oct-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  31. 17-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  32. 27-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  33. 19-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  34. 23-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  35. 19-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  36. 10-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  37. 26-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  38. 12-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  39. 28-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 30-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 93/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The petition filed by P Dot G Constructions Private Limited (represented by its Director Mohan Srinivasan) to be impleaded as the 5th defendant in Commercial Original Suit No.93/2024 was allowed. The court found the petitioner to be a necessary party since the company P Dot G underwent insolvency proceedings and was taken over by RCC e-Construct Private Limited, with the petitioner being the authorized signatory per the board resolution dated 16.09.2020. The court determined that impleading the petitioner would not prejudice the plaintiffs and would serve the interests of justice and proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case