A. Kalaparipoorna vs The Special Tahsildar(LA)Unit VI, Outer Ring Road Project and another Advocate - GP — 233/2020

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section u/s18. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Amendment Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNTR010036452020

Filing Number

1306/2020

Filing Date

03-Nov-2020

Registration No

233/2020

Registration Date

04-Nov-2020

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section u/s18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A. Kalaparipoorna

    Adv. B.S.Jothiraman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Special Tahsildar(LA)Unit VI, Outer Ring Road Project and another Advocate - GP

  2. 2.Member Secretary

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 07-Nov-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 08-Oct-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 04-Sep-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 20-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  11. 20-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: LAOP.233/2020 Court: Principal District Judge, Tiruvallur Date: 20 August 2025 Outcome: Both petitions ALLOWED. The petitioners were impleaded as necessary parties in the original land acquisition proceeding. In I.A.1/2023, S. Sailaja was added as 2nd claimant. In I.A.2/2024, Dr. V. Deepthi and V. Sandeep were added as claimants 3 and 4. The court found that under Hindu Succession Act Section 15(2), all legal heirs of the deceased mother (Nagarathinammal) are entitled to equal shares in acquired compensation, regardless of a will executed before acquisition. Since the petitioners were referred in the land acquisition officer's reference and had protested before the officer, they qualified as necessary parties under Section 20 of the Land Acquisition Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 20-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  13. 18-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  14. 31-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  15. 23-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  16. 18-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  17. 02-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  18. 20-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  19. 21-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  20. 24-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  21. 14-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  22. 20-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  23. 26-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  24. 24-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  25. 19-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  26. 03-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  27. 05-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  28. 22-Dec-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  29. 12-Oct-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  30. 27-Sep-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  31. 22-Sep-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  32. 05-Aug-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  33. 23-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  34. 20-Apr-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  35. 31-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  36. 02-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  37. 15-Feb-2023

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  38. 11-Feb-2023

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  39. 03-Feb-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  40. 27-Jan-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  41. 06-Jan-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  42. 20-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  43. 12-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  44. 29-Apr-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  45. 25-Feb-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  46. 05-Jan-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  47. 17-Dec-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  48. 12-Nov-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  49. 06-Oct-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  50. 29-Sep-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  51. 03-Sep-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  52. 08-Jul-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  53. 30-Apr-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  54. 26-Mar-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  55. 05-Mar-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  56. 29-Jan-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  57. 10-Dec-2020

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  58. 04-Nov-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 03-Nov-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 233/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LAOP.233/2020 Court: Principal District Judge, Tiruvallur Date: 20 August 2025 Outcome: Both petitions ALLOWED. The petitioners were impleaded as necessary parties in the original land acquisition proceeding. In I.A.1/2023, S. Sailaja was added as 2nd claimant. In I.A.2/2024, Dr. V. Deepthi and V. Sandeep were added as claimants 3 and 4. The court found that under Hindu Succession Act Section 15(2), all legal heirs of the deceased mother (Nagarathinammal) are entitled to equal shares in acquired compensation, regardless of a will executed before acquisition. Since the petitioners were referred in the land acquisition officer's reference and had protested before the officer, they qualified as necessary parties under Section 20 of the Land Acquisition Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case