Chithra vs The Inspector of Police, Arani Police Station,Thiruvallur District, Cr.NO. 11/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1005/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),296(b),115(2),324(4),74. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010020342026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
1273/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
1005/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
Arani Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chithra
Adv. P.Chandra Sekar
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of Police, Arani Police Station,Thiruvallur District, Cr.NO. 11/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Chithra in a case involving alleged offences under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 324(4), and 74, arising from a February 2026 altercation near a temple. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the petitioner's status as a first-time offender and local resident, the completion of substantial investigation, absence of major injuries, and that all offences carried maximum imprisonment of only seven years. Bail was granted on execution of Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, requiring surrender within 15 days and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Chithra in a case involving alleged offences under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 324(4), and 74, arising from a February 2026 altercation near a temple. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the petitioner's status as a first-time offender and local resident, the completion of substantial investigation, absence of major injuries, and that all offences carried maximum imprisonment of only seven years. Bail was granted on execution of Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, requiring surrender within 15 days and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts