Vinothkumar vs The Inspector of police, Vengal ps, Cr. No. 69/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 989/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),331(1),62,64,75(1). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010020262026
Filing Number
1267/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
989/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
69
Police Station
Vengal Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vinothkumar
Adv. D.lemuvel
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of police, Vengal ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 69/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 989/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Vinothkumar's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS on March 18, 2026. Vinothkumar was arrested on charges of trespassing into a woman's house and attempting to molest her under TNPWH Act and BNS sections 296(b), 331(1), 62, 64, and 75(1). The court denied bail citing the grave nature of the offense against a woman, ongoing investigation at preliminary stage, serious accusations under BNS Section 64, and other circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 989/2026
Case Summary: 989/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Vinothkumar's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS on March 18, 2026. Vinothkumar was arrested on charges of trespassing into a woman's house and attempting to molest her under TNPWH Act and BNS sections 296(b), 331(1), 62, 64, and 75(1). The court denied bail citing the grave nature of the offense against a woman, ongoing investigation at preliminary stage, serious accusations under BNS Section 64, and other circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts