Ayyappan (a) Sabari (a) Sabarivel vs The Inspector of police, Pathirvedu ps, Cr. No. 42/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 999/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75(2), 79. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010020142026

Filing Number

1257/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

999/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

Padirivedu. P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75(2), 79
Sc / St (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ayyappan (a) Sabari (a) Sabarivel

    Adv. M.R.Sugumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, Pathirvedu ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 42/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 999/2026 Summary: The court dismissed Ayyappan's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS. Ayyappan was accused of sexually assaulting a woman, making caste-based remarks, uploading defamatory videos/audio on social media, and violating the SC/ST Act. The court refused bail citing the grave nature of the offence against a woman, ongoing preliminary investigation, serious accusations under BNS Sections 75(2), 79, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(va), and absence of changed circumstances warranting release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 999/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 999/2026 Summary: The court dismissed Ayyappan's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS. Ayyappan was accused of sexually assaulting a woman, making caste-based remarks, uploading defamatory videos/audio on social media, and violating the SC/ST Act. The court refused bail citing the grave nature of the offence against a woman, ongoing preliminary investigation, serious accusations under BNS Sections 75(2), 79, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(va), and absence of changed circumstances warranting release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case