Perarasu D vs The Inspector of Police, Thiruvelangadu ps, Cr. No. 32/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 995/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 351(2), 309(4), 329(4), 326(F). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010020062026
Filing Number
1249/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
995/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
Thiruvalangadu Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Perarasu D
Adv. A.Thirumalai
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvelangadu ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 32/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 995/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed D. Perarasu's bail petition on March 16, 2026. Perarasu was arrested in connection with charges of criminal intimidation, house trespass, criminal mischief, voluntarily causing hurt, and cyber crime involving damaging a two-wheeler (₹50,000 loss), threatening death, and unauthorized money transfer (₹19,000) via G-Pay. The court denied bail citing the grave nature of offences, ongoing preliminary investigation, incomplete first remand period, serious accusations under BNS Section 326(f), and substantial property damage involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 995/2026
Case Summary: 995/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed D. Perarasu's bail petition on March 16, 2026. Perarasu was arrested in connection with charges of criminal intimidation, house trespass, criminal mischief, voluntarily causing hurt, and cyber crime involving damaging a two-wheeler (₹50,000 loss), threatening death, and unauthorized money transfer (₹19,000) via G-Pay. The court denied bail citing the grave nature of offences, ongoing preliminary investigation, incomplete first remand period, serious accusations under BNS Section 326(f), and substantial property damage involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts