Sree vs The Inspector of police, Thiruttani ps, Cr. No. 72/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 984/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2), 191(3), 308(4),324(b), 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010019922026

Filing Number

1243/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

984/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

72

Police Station

Tiruttani PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2), 191(3), 308(4),324(b), 351(3)
Arms Act, 1959 Section 27(1)
Tn Public Property (Prvnt.of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 Section 3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sree

    Adv. D.Ranesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, Thiruttani ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 72/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to the petitioner Sree in a case involving alleged criminal intimidation, trespass, and damage to property. The court considered the 35-day custody period, completion of substantial investigation, absence of injury to anyone, the petitioner's status as a local resident, and the co-accused already receiving bail. Bail was granted on execution of a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, deposit of Rs. 7,500, and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 984/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to the petitioner Sree in a case involving alleged criminal intimidation, trespass, and damage to property. The court considered the 35-day custody period, completion of substantial investigation, absence of injury to anyone, the petitioner's status as a local resident, and the co-accused already receiving bail. Bail was granted on execution of a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, deposit of Rs. 7,500, and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case