Gopi vs The Inspector of police, Pattabiram ps, Cr. No. 46/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 981/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),296(b),109,351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010019832026

Filing Number

1236/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

981/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

Pattabiram Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),296(b),109,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gopi

    Adv. K.Elangovan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, Pattabiram ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 46/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted bail to Gopi, accused of trespass, assault, and related offences under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 109, and 351(3), after 28 days in judicial custody. The court considered that the petitioner is a local resident and first offender, substantial investigation is complete, the injured party is discharged, and co-accused were already granted bail. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and the condition that the petitioner report daily to police for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 981/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted bail to Gopi, accused of trespass, assault, and related offences under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 109, and 351(3), after 28 days in judicial custody. The court considered that the petitioner is a local resident and first offender, substantial investigation is complete, the injured party is discharged, and co-accused were already granted bail. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and the condition that the petitioner report daily to police for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case