Ajay (a) Vellai Ajay vs The Inspector of police, R9 Valasaravakkam ps, Cr. No. 55/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 964/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 278, 123, 132. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010019332026

Filing Number

1227/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

964/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

Valasaravakkam. P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 278, 123, 132

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajay (a) Vellai Ajay

    Adv. V.Nirmalraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, R9 Valasaravakkam ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 55/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Ajay @ Vellai Ajay, who was arrested for possession of banned tapentedol tablets without valid license under sections 278, 123, and 132 of BNS. The court declined bail citing the grave nature of the offense, ongoing investigation at a preliminary stage, the petitioner's five prior criminal cases, and the risk of absconding that could affect multiple investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 964/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Ajay @ Vellai Ajay, who was arrested for possession of banned tapentedol tablets without valid license under sections 278, 123, and 132 of BNS. The court declined bail citing the grave nature of the offense, ongoing investigation at a preliminary stage, the petitioner's five prior criminal cases, and the risk of absconding that could affect multiple investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case