The Inspector of Police, Arambakkam PS vs Duraisamy and 2 others — 226/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 446,324,506,34. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNTR010019312018

Part Heard

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

Filing Number

226/2018

Filing Date

21-12-2018

Registration No

226/2018

Registration Date

21-12-2018

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

Arambakkam. P.S.

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 446,324,506,34
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 Section 3
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 311 Cr.pc Section The Inspector of Police, Arambakkam PSDuraisamy and 2 others
Mp/12/2026 Classification : Others Section Duraisamy and 2 othersThe Inspector of Police, Arambakkam PS
Mp/13/2026 Classification : Others Section Duraisamy and 2 othersThe Inspector of Police, Arambakkam PS
Mp/14/2026 Classification : Others Section Duraisamy and 2 othersThe Inspector of Police, Arambakkam PS

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police, Arambakkam PS (Police Station)

Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

Duraisamy and 2 others

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

20-04-2026

Part Heard

17-03-2026

Part Heard

12-03-2026

Part Heard

09-03-2026

Part Heard

09-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

17-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

On 17.03.2026, the court recalled witness PW1 (Thiru. Susaiarul) for re-examination and administered oath. The witness was then permitted to undergo cross-examination by the opposing counsel. The cross-examination commenced at 13.35 hours and the witness's statement was recorded and read over to him in open court, which he admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

On 17.03.2026, the court recalled witness PW1 (Thiru. Susaiarul) for re-examination and administered oath. The witness was then permitted to undergo cross-examination by the opposing counsel. The cross-examination commenced at 13.35 hours and the witness's statement was recorded and read over to him in open court, which he admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case