SANTHAKUMAR vs The Inspector of Police, B8, Pullarambakkam Police Station, Cr No. 166 of 2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 945/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 08th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010018962026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
1205/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
945/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
166
Police Station
Pullarambakkam Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANTHAKUMAR
Adv. VINOTH KUMAR R
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of Police, B8, Pullarambakkam Police Station, Cr No. 166 of 2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 26-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 18-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No 945/2026 Court Decision: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur dismissed P. Santhakumar's anticipatory bail petition on 8 April 2026. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the bail plea considering: (i) the grave environmental nature of the offence under BNS sections 303(2) and 326(a) involving unlicensed river sand transportation; (ii) ongoing investigation; (iii) the serious accusations against the petitioner as A2 (second accused); and (iv) that the petitioner cannot claim parity with the co-accused who was already arrested and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No 945/2026 Court Decision: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur dismissed P. Santhakumar's anticipatory bail petition on 8 April 2026. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the bail plea considering: (i) the grave environmental nature of the offence under BNS sections 303(2) and 326(a) involving unlicensed river sand transportation; (ii) ongoing investigation; (iii) the serious accusations against the petitioner as A2 (second accused); and (iv) that the petitioner cannot claim parity with the co-accused who was already arrested and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts