V. Yukesh (a) Vikesh vs The Inspector Of Police, Periyapalayam Police Station, Cr.No. 71/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 948/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),118(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010018952026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
1204/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
948/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
71
Police Station
Periyapalayam Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V. Yukesh (a) Vikesh
Adv. Suresh Suresh
Bommi
Adv. Suresh Suresh
Respondent(s)
The Inspector Of Police, Periyapalayam Police Station, Cr.No. 71/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 02-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 27-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 24-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to V. Yukesh and Bommi in Crime No. 71/2026 (charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1)) arising from an alleged assault on 26.02.2026. The court found that since the petitioners were first offenders, local residents, the second petitioner was a woman, substantial investigation was complete, and the injured victim had been discharged from hospital, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was granted on condition of Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties each, surrender within 15 days, and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to V. Yukesh and Bommi in Crime No. 71/2026 (charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1)) arising from an alleged assault on 26.02.2026. The court found that since the petitioners were first offenders, local residents, the second petitioner was a woman, substantial investigation was complete, and the injured victim had been discharged from hospital, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was granted on condition of Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties each, surrender within 15 days, and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts