Dineshkumar vs The Inspector of police, Periyapalayam ps, Cr. No. 74/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 928/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 126, 132, 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 30th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010018812026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1198/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

928/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

74

Police Station

Periyapalayam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 126, 132, 351(3)
CRIMINAL LAW AMENDMENT ACT, 2005 Section 7(1)(a)
ARMS ACT, 1959 Section 25(a)

Petitioner(s)

Dineshkumar

Adv. V.N.Suresh

Respondent(s)

The Inspector of police, Periyapalayam ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 74/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

30-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Orders

17-03-2026

Issue of Service

11-03-2026

Issue of Service

07-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted bail to Dineshkumar, who was arrested for possessing a knife and threatening the public under BNS sections 296(b), 126, 132, 351(3) and the Arms Act. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for 29 days, the injured person was discharged, co-accused were already bailed, and investigation was substantially complete. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and the condition that the petitioner report daily to police for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted bail to Dineshkumar, who was arrested for possessing a knife and threatening the public under BNS sections 296(b), 126, 132, 351(3) and the Arms Act. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for 29 days, the injured person was discharged, co-accused were already bailed, and investigation was substantially complete. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and the condition that the petitioner report daily to police for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case