Dineshkumar vs The Inspector of police, Periyapalayam ps, Cr. No. 74/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 928/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 126, 132, 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 30th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010018812026
Filing Number
1198/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
928/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 20-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
74
Police Station
Periyapalayam Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dineshkumar
Adv. V.N.Suresh
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of police, Periyapalayam ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 74/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted bail to Dineshkumar, who was arrested for possessing a knife and threatening the public under BNS sections 296(b), 126, 132, 351(3) and the Arms Act. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for 29 days, the injured person was discharged, co-accused were already bailed, and investigation was substantially complete. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and the condition that the petitioner report daily to police for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 928/2026
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted bail to Dineshkumar, who was arrested for possessing a knife and threatening the public under BNS sections 296(b), 126, 132, 351(3) and the Arms Act. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for 29 days, the injured person was discharged, co-accused were already bailed, and investigation was substantially complete. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and the condition that the petitioner report daily to police for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts