S. Venkatesan (a) Sonatica vs The Inspector of police, Manavala Nagar ps, Cr. No. 48/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 932/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010018642026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1183/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

932/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

Manavalanagar Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2)
Explosive Substances Act, 1908 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

S. Venkatesan (a) Sonatica

Adv. A.M.Nebel Shinu Joe

Respondent(s)

The Inspector of police, Manavala Nagar ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 48/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Issue of Service

07-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary - Crl.M.P. No. 932/2026 The court dismissed S. Venkatesan's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS. The petitioner was arrested on 02.03.2026 for possession of country-made bombs under Section 61(2) BNS read with Section 5 Explosive Substances Act 1908, allegedly to take revenge for a murder. The court denied bail considering: (i) grave nature of the offence, (ii) preliminary investigation stage, (iii) petitioner's 26 prior criminal cases, and (iv) flight risk if released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - Crl.M.P. No. 932/2026 The court dismissed S. Venkatesan's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS. The petitioner was arrested on 02.03.2026 for possession of country-made bombs under Section 61(2) BNS read with Section 5 Explosive Substances Act 1908, allegedly to take revenge for a murder. The court denied bail considering: (i) grave nature of the offence, (ii) preliminary investigation stage, (iii) petitioner's 26 prior criminal cases, and (iv) flight risk if released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case