Rajesh vs The Inspector of police, T-12, Poonamallee ps, Chennai, Cr. No. 17/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 943/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 296(b), 311, 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010018572026
Filing Number
1181/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
943/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
Poonamallee. P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajesh
Adv. S. Senthil Kumar
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of police, T-12, Poonamallee ps (Police Station), Chennai, Cr. No. 17/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Rajesh's bail petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS. The court found that the grave nature of the offences (robbery, assault, criminal intimidation under BNS Sections 126, 296, 311, 351), pending investigation, the petitioner's 22 prior criminal cases, and risk of absconding or reoffending warranted continued custody. No change in circumstances justified bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Rajesh's bail petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS. The court found that the grave nature of the offences (robbery, assault, criminal intimidation under BNS Sections 126, 296, 311, 351), pending investigation, the petitioner's 22 prior criminal cases, and risk of absconding or reoffending warranted continued custody. No change in circumstances justified bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts