Manikandan vs The Inspector of police , Thiruvalangadu P.S, Crime no 14/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 916/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 326(f) @ 326(g). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010018432026

Filing Number

1169/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

916/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 326(f) @ 326(g)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manikandan

    Adv. M.Thamil Selvan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police , Thiruvalangadu P.S, Crime no 14/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Manikandan's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving arson (Section 326(g) BNS) with alleged damages of Rs. 50,000. The court rejected bail citing the grave nature of the offense, ongoing investigation in preliminary stage, insufficient remand period completion, and substantial damage caused, finding no grounds to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 916/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Manikandan's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving arson (Section 326(g) BNS) with alleged damages of Rs. 50,000. The court rejected bail citing the grave nature of the offense, ongoing investigation in preliminary stage, insufficient remand period completion, and substantial damage caused, finding no grounds to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case