Lokesh vs The Inspector of police, Pattabiram ps, Cr. No. 45/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 920/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 296(b), 118(1), 109, 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010018282026
Filing Number
1165/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
920/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lokesh
Adv. M.Thamil Selvan
-
2.Manikandan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of police, Pattabiram ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 45/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court granted bail to the 2nd petitioner (Manikandan) while dismissing the petition for the 1st petitioner (Lokesh) as not pressed. The court considered factors including the 44-day custody period, completion of substantial investigation, discharge of the injured person, and the petitioner's status as a permanent resident. Bail was conditional on executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and daily police sign-in for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 920/2026
The court granted bail to the 2nd petitioner (Manikandan) while dismissing the petition for the 1st petitioner (Lokesh) as not pressed. The court considered factors including the 44-day custody period, completion of substantial investigation, discharge of the injured person, and the petitioner's status as a permanent resident. Bail was conditional on executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and daily police sign-in for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts