Alla Bakash vs The Inspector of police, Poonamallee ps, Cr. No. 35/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 913/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 309(4), 311, 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010018212026

Filing Number

1161/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

913/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 309(4), 311, 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Alla Bakash

    Adv. R.Rajaprakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, Poonamallee ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 35/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Alla Bakash's bail petition under Section 483 of BNSS. The court denied bail citing the grave nature of offences (robbery with knife, wrongful restraint), ongoing investigation in preliminary stage, 15 prior criminal cases, and risk of absconding that could compromise investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 913/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Alla Bakash's bail petition under Section 483 of BNSS. The court denied bail citing the grave nature of offences (robbery with knife, wrongful restraint), ongoing investigation in preliminary stage, 15 prior criminal cases, and risk of absconding that could compromise investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case