Anbumani (a) Commando vs The Inspector of police, B7 Vellavedu ps, Cr. No. 43/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 903/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 308(2), 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010018202026

Filing Number

1160/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

903/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 308(2), 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anbumani (a) Commando

    Adv. A.Thirumalai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, B7 Vellavedu ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 43/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Anbumani @ Commando, who was arrested for alleged knife-point extortion of Rs. 1,000, citing the grave nature of the offense under BNS sections 296(b), 308(2), and 351(3), the preliminary stage of investigation, and the petitioner's five prior criminal cases. The court noted that releasing the accused could risk absconding and jeopardize ongoing investigations across multiple cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 903/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Anbumani @ Commando, who was arrested for alleged knife-point extortion of Rs. 1,000, citing the grave nature of the offense under BNS sections 296(b), 308(2), and 351(3), the preliminary stage of investigation, and the petitioner's five prior criminal cases. The court noted that releasing the accused could risk absconding and jeopardize ongoing investigations across multiple cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case