Abdul Asan Khudush vs The Inspector of police, CCB, Avadi ps, Cr. No. 24/2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 905/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,465,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010018152026
Filing Number
1155/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
905/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Abdul Asan Khudush
Adv. N.Kannan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of police, CCB, Avadi ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 24/2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Abdul Asan Khudush, who was arrested in connection with a property fraud case involving allegedly forged documents and patta (land ownership certificate). The court found the offences grave, the investigation in preliminary stage, and the property value substantial, making bail inappropriate at this juncture despite the petitioner's claims of being falsely implicated and a bonafide purchaser. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 905/2026
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Abdul Asan Khudush, who was arrested in connection with a property fraud case involving allegedly forged documents and patta (land ownership certificate). The court found the offences grave, the investigation in preliminary stage, and the property value substantial, making bail inappropriate at this juncture despite the petitioner's claims of being falsely implicated and a bonafide purchaser. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts