Ragul vs The Inspector of police, R-9 Valasaravakkam ps, Chennai, Cr. No. 334/2025 Advocate - Special Public Prosecutor — 901/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 278, 123, 132. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010018102026

Filing Number

1150/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

901/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 278, 123, 132

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ragul

    Adv. V.Azhagunila

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, R-9 Valasaravakkam ps (Police Station), Chennai, Cr. No. 334/2025 Advocate - Special Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Ragul's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS in a drug possession case (500 Tapentadol tablets without license under BNS Sections 278, 123, 132). The court rejected bail citing the grave nature of the offense, pending investigation at preliminary stage, serious accusations, the petitioner's previous criminal case, and flight risk concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 901/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Ragul's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS in a drug possession case (500 Tapentadol tablets without license under BNS Sections 278, 123, 132). The court rejected bail citing the grave nature of the offense, pending investigation at preliminary stage, serious accusations, the petitioner's previous criminal case, and flight risk concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case