Gopi vs The Inspector of police, Pattabiram ps, Thiruvallur Dt, Cr. No. 46/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 919/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),296(b),109,351(3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010018072026

Filing Number

1148/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

919/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),296(b),109,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gopi

    Adv. K.Elangovan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, Pattabiram ps (Police Station), Thiruvallur Dt, Cr. No. 46/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Gopi, accused under sections 126(2), 296(b), 109, and 351(3) of the BNS for allegedly trespassing, abusing, and assaulting the complainant with a wooden log. The court declined bail citing the grave nature of the offence, pending investigation, serious accusations under section 109 BNS, the petitioner's two prior criminal cases, and risk of absconding that could hamper investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 919/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Gopi, accused under sections 126(2), 296(b), 109, and 351(3) of the BNS for allegedly trespassing, abusing, and assaulting the complainant with a wooden log. The court declined bail citing the grave nature of the offence, pending investigation, serious accusations under section 109 BNS, the petitioner's two prior criminal cases, and risk of absconding that could hamper investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case