K. BALASUBRAMANIYAN vs The Inspector of Police,T4 Madhuravoyal Police Station, Cr.No. 123/2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 899/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010018032026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

1145/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

899/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

Madhuravoyal P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K. BALASUBRAMANIYAN

    Adv. CHARLES S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police,T4 Madhuravoyal Police Station, Cr.No. 123/2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge dismissed K. Balasubramaniyan's anticipatory bail petition (Case 899/2026) in a vehicle theft case under Section 303(2) BNS. The court rejected the bail despite the petitioner's claims of innocence and cooperation, citing the grave nature of the offense, pending investigation, significant property value involved, and the fact that this was a second bail petition with no changed circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 899/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge dismissed K. Balasubramaniyan's anticipatory bail petition (Case 899/2026) in a vehicle theft case under Section 303(2) BNS. The court rejected the bail despite the petitioner's claims of innocence and cooperation, citing the grave nature of the offense, pending investigation, significant property value involved, and the fact that this was a second bail petition with no changed circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case