SAMUNDEESWARI. V vs SANTHI. R — 92/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Made Over on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNTR010017672026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

1125/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

92/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Made Over

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3)

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

1.SAMUNDEESWARI. V

Adv. Arumugam A

Respondent(s)

1.SANTHI. R

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Copy of OrderView PDF

Case Summary: Samundeeswari v. Santhi (92/2026) The court suspended the one-year imprisonment sentence imposed on the petitioner (convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 15,00,000) pending appeal, rejecting her request for exemption from the 20% compensation deposit requirement as lacking exceptional circumstances. However, the court reduced the deposit condition to 10% of the compensation amount (Rs. 30,00,000), requiring the petitioner to deposit Rs. 3,00,000 within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Appearance

Principal District and Sessions Judge
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District and Sessions Judge
06-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
02-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 92/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Samundeeswari v. Santhi (92/2026) The court suspended the one-year imprisonment sentence imposed on the petitioner (convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 15,00,000) pending appeal, rejecting her request for exemption from the 20% compensation deposit requirement as lacking exceptional circumstances. However, the court reduced the deposit condition to 10% of the compensation amount (Rs. 30,00,000), requiring the petitioner to deposit Rs. 3,00,000 within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.