P. Anand vs The Inspector of police, T6, Avadi ps, Avadi, Cr. No. 49/2026 — 952/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010017662026

Filing Number

1124/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

952/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

49

Police Station

Avadi. P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Anand

    Adv. S. Anbarasan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, T6, Avadi ps (Police Station), Avadi, Cr. No. 49/2026

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed P. Anand's bail petition under Section 483 of BNSS in a property fraud case involving alleged cheating and forgery (Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS). The court denied bail considering the grave nature of the offense, ongoing investigation, serious accusations, substantial property value involved, and risk of absconding given similar pending complaints against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 952/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed P. Anand's bail petition under Section 483 of BNSS in a property fraud case involving alleged cheating and forgery (Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS). The court denied bail considering the grave nature of the offense, ongoing investigation, serious accusations, substantial property value involved, and risk of absconding given similar pending complaints against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case