Bharath vs The Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station Redhills, Cr.No. 630/2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 875/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),296(b),329(4),115(2),118(1),324(4),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010017632026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
1121/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
875/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bharath
Adv. Murugan C
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station Redhills, Cr.No. 630/2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 04-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted anticipatory bail to Bharath S/o. Pooniyakotti in Crime No. 630/2025, charged with offenses under BNS sections 191, 296, 329, 115, 118, 324, and 351, arising from a land dispute incident. The court found that as a first offender and local resident with substantial investigation completed, the injured discharged, and maximum punishment being 7 years imprisonment, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, surrender before the Magistrate within 15 days, and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted anticipatory bail to Bharath S/o. Pooniyakotti in Crime No. 630/2025, charged with offenses under BNS sections 191, 296, 329, 115, 118, 324, and 351, arising from a land dispute incident. The court found that as a first offender and local resident with substantial investigation completed, the injured discharged, and maximum punishment being 7 years imprisonment, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, surrender before the Magistrate within 15 days, and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts