Durai Pandi vs The Inspector of police, CCB Avadi ps, Avadi city, Cr. No. 24/2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 864/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 465, 467, 468, 471. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010017152026
Filing Number
1099/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
864/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Durai Pandi
Adv. S.Sridhar Raj
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of police, CCB Avadi ps (Police Station), Avadi city, Cr. No. 24/2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Durai Pandi, who was arrested for alleged forgery and property fraud offenses (IPC §420, 465, 467, 468, 471). The court found the accusations serious, involving forged property documents and unauthorized land encroachment worth significant value, with investigation still pending at a preliminary stage, justifying continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 864/2026
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Durai Pandi, who was arrested for alleged forgery and property fraud offenses (IPC §420, 465, 467, 468, 471). The court found the accusations serious, involving forged property documents and unauthorized land encroachment worth significant value, with investigation still pending at a preliminary stage, justifying continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts