Logeshwari (a) Deepika vs The Inspector of Police, Ponneri E-1 Police station, Crime No. 26/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 848/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238,351(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010016952026

Filing Number

1082/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

848/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Logeshwari (a) Deepika

    Adv. R. Loganathan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police, Ponneri E-1 Police station, Crime No. 26/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Logeshwari @ Deepika, accused under BNS sections 103(1) (murder), 238, and 351(2), who had been in custody for 31 days. The court rejected bail citing the grave nature of the offense, ongoing investigation at a preliminary stage, serious accusations against the petitioner, and no change in circumstances, holding that premature release was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 848/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Logeshwari @ Deepika, accused under BNS sections 103(1) (murder), 238, and 351(2), who had been in custody for 31 days. The court rejected bail citing the grave nature of the offense, ongoing investigation at a preliminary stage, serious accusations against the petitioner, and no change in circumstances, holding that premature release was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case