Babu vs The Inspector of police, Avadi tank factory ps, Cr. No. 47/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 829/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 326(g), 351(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010016552026

Filing Number

1051/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

829/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 326(g), 351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Babu

    Adv. V.Nirmalraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, Avadi tank factory ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 47/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the bail petition of Babu, accused of deliberately setting fire to three houses causing damage, under sections 296(b), 326(g), and 351(3) of BNS. The judge denied bail citing the grave nature of the offense, ongoing investigation in preliminary stage, serious accusations, substantial property damage, and absence of changed circumstances. The accused remained in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 829/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the bail petition of Babu, accused of deliberately setting fire to three houses causing damage, under sections 296(b), 326(g), and 351(3) of BNS. The judge denied bail citing the grave nature of the offense, ongoing investigation in preliminary stage, serious accusations, substantial property damage, and absence of changed circumstances. The accused remained in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case