The Inspector of Police Avadi CCB EDF 1 Team, CCB, Avadi Commissionerate vs Mondem Sreenivasalu — 8/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, r/w 440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition
CNR: TNTR010016242026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
1030/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector of Police Avadi CCB EDF 1 Team, CCB, Avadi Commissionerate
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE CCB ADMIN
Respondent(s)
Mondem Sreenivasalu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting police remand for the accused in a cheating case involving Rs. 1 crore. The court found that the remand requisition contained prima facie evidence of cheating under IPC sections 406 and 420, including witness statements, seizure records, and the accused's confession, and that the lower court's rejection was unsustainable and based on premature observations about the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting police remand for the accused in a cheating case involving Rs. 1 crore. The court found that the remand requisition contained prima facie evidence of cheating under IPC sections 406 and 420, including witness statements, seizure records, and the accused's confession, and that the lower court's rejection was unsustainable and based on premature observations about the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts