The Inspector of Police Avadi CCB EDF 1 Team, CCB, Avadi Commissionerate vs Mondem Sreenivasalu — 8/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, r/w 440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition
CNR: TNTR010016242026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
1030/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police Avadi CCB EDF 1 Team, CCB, Avadi Commissionerate
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE CCB ADMIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mondem Sreenivasalu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting police remand for the accused in a cheating case involving Rs. 1 crore. The court found that the remand requisition contained prima facie evidence of cheating under IPC sections 406 and 420, including witness statements, seizure records, and the accused's confession, and that the lower court's rejection was unsustainable and based on premature observations about the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2026
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting police remand for the accused in a cheating case involving Rs. 1 crore. The court found that the remand requisition contained prima facie evidence of cheating under IPC sections 406 and 420, including witness statements, seizure records, and the accused's confession, and that the lower court's rejection was unsustainable and based on premature observations about the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts