The Inspector of Police Avadi CCB EDF 1 Team, CCB, Avadi Commissionerate vs Mondem Sreenivasalu — 8/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, r/w 440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition

CNR: TNTR010016242026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

1030/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, r/w 440

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police Avadi CCB EDF 1 Team, CCB, Avadi Commissionerate

Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE CCB ADMIN

Respondent(s)

Mondem Sreenivasalu

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Orders

04-03-2026

Arguments

02-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting police remand for the accused in a cheating case involving Rs. 1 crore. The court found that the remand requisition contained prima facie evidence of cheating under IPC sections 406 and 420, including witness statements, seizure records, and the accused's confession, and that the lower court's rejection was unsustainable and based on premature observations about the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting police remand for the accused in a cheating case involving Rs. 1 crore. The court found that the remand requisition contained prima facie evidence of cheating under IPC sections 406 and 420, including witness statements, seizure records, and the accused's confession, and that the lower court's rejection was unsustainable and based on premature observations about the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case