PAVAN KUMAR vs The Inspector of Police (Crime Branch), T-1 Police station, Ambattur, Crime No. 720/2022 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 818/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,414,34. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010016022026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

1010/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

818/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 380,414,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAVAN KUMAR

    Adv. GOPINATH S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police (Crime Branch), T-1 Police station, Ambattur, Crime No. 720/2022 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Pavan Kumar's bail petition (Crl.M.P. No. 818/2026), denying him bail in a theft case involving stolen gold allegedly pledged at his father's pawn shop. The court found the offence serious under Section 380 IPC, noted the investigation was pending at a premature stage, and considered the substantial value of property involved and the petitioner's criminal antecedents as grounds for detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 818/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Pavan Kumar's bail petition (Crl.M.P. No. 818/2026), denying him bail in a theft case involving stolen gold allegedly pledged at his father's pawn shop. The court found the offence serious under Section 380 IPC, noted the investigation was pending at a premature stage, and considered the substantial value of property involved and the petitioner's criminal antecedents as grounds for detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case