KANNAN vs The Inspector of Police, Arambakkam Police Station, CrimeNo 31 /2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 772/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010015542026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
978/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
772/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANNAN
Adv. GNANA PRAKASH M
-
2.SANTHI
Adv. GNANA PRAKASH M
-
3.RANJITH
Adv. GNANA PRAKASH M
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police, Arambakkam Police Station, CrimeNo 31 /2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Kannan, Santhi, and Ranjith) in a case involving charges under Section 296(b) of BNS and Section 67 of the IT Act, stemming from a dispute over morphed photographs uploaded on WhatsApp. The court considered the minor nature of the offence (punishable up to 7 years), the petitioners' status as local first-time offenders with no serious injuries caused, and substantial completion of investigation. Bail was granted on execution of Rs. 10,000 bonds each with sureties, surrender within 15 days, and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 772/2026
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Kannan, Santhi, and Ranjith) in a case involving charges under Section 296(b) of BNS and Section 67 of the IT Act, stemming from a dispute over morphed photographs uploaded on WhatsApp. The court considered the minor nature of the offence (punishable up to 7 years), the petitioners' status as local first-time offenders with no serious injuries caused, and substantial completion of investigation. Bail was granted on execution of Rs. 10,000 bonds each with sureties, surrender within 15 days, and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts