LOGESWARAN vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,THIRUVALLUR FOREST OFFICER,WLOR NO 3 0F 2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 691/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010013712026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
889/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
691/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LOGESWARAN
Adv. Magesh D
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,THIRUVALLUR FOREST OFFICER,WLOR NO 3 0F 2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 17-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Logeswaran under section 482 of BNSS in a wildlife smuggling case involving illegal pangolin trafficking weighing 10 KG. The court rejected the bail plea considering the grave nature of the environmental offense, pending investigation at preliminary stage, and the value of seized property, finding no grounds to grant anticipatory bail despite the co-accused being released by the Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Logeswaran under section 482 of BNSS in a wildlife smuggling case involving illegal pangolin trafficking weighing 10 KG. The court rejected the bail plea considering the grave nature of the environmental offense, pending investigation at preliminary stage, and the value of seized property, finding no grounds to grant anticipatory bail despite the co-accused being released by the Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts