Suresh vs The Inspector of Police, M5 Ennore Police Station, Ennore, Chennai, Cr.No. 562/2024 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 693/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010013692026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
887/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
693/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
562
Police Station
Ennore Police station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh
Adv. Vignesh K
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of Police, M5 Ennore Police Station, Ennore, Chennai, Cr.No. 562/2024 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 17-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Suresh's anticipatory bail petition in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating). The court rejected the bail plea considering the grave nature of the offence, pending investigation, large unrecovered amount (over Rs. 9 lakhs), and premature stage of proceedings, despite the petitioner's claim that the matter was a civil dispute regarding a personal loan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed Suresh's anticipatory bail petition in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating). The court rejected the bail plea considering the grave nature of the offence, pending investigation, large unrecovered amount (over Rs. 9 lakhs), and premature stage of proceedings, despite the petitioner's claim that the matter was a civil dispute regarding a personal loan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts