Boobalan vs The Inspector of PoIice, D1,Tiruttani Police Station, Cr.No. Not known/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 623/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),296(b),115(2),118(1), 351(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010012222026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
796/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
623/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Boobalan
Adv. MOHANRAM G
-
2.Subramani
Adv. MOHANRAM G
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of PoIice, D1,Tiruttani Police Station, Cr.No. Not known/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Boobalan and Subramani under Section 482 of BNSS. The court ruled that since the underlying criminal case (CSR No. 384/2026) had already been closed due to compromise between the parties, the question of apprehension of arrest no longer existed, making the anticipatory bail petition moot and dismissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 623/2026
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Boobalan and Subramani under Section 482 of BNSS. The court ruled that since the underlying criminal case (CSR No. 384/2026) had already been closed due to compromise between the parties, the question of apprehension of arrest no longer existed, making the anticipatory bail petition moot and dismissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts