ASOKAN S/o KANDASAMY vs Special District Revenue Officer — 148/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 30th April 2026.
LAOP - Land Acquisition Original Petition
CNR: TNTR010008522026
e-Filing Number
29-01-2026
Filing Number
326/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
148/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASOKAN S/o KANDASAMY
Respondent(s)
Special District Revenue Officer
The Divisional Engineer (H) Construction and Maintenance, Chennai Greater City Roads Division -2 Arumbakkam, Chennai
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Orders |
| 02-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 25-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 18-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
The court examined land acquisition cases (LAOP Nos. 148-156/2026) under the Indian Penal Code, 1871, Section 1, filed in Tiruvallur district on March 25, 2026. The Principal District and Sessions Judge analyzed the acquisition of land parcels NH 205 and SH 58 for public road construction, examining witness testimonies regarding land measurements, existing structures (hotels, educational institutions, commercial establishments), and compliance with land acquisition procedures. The judgment validates the acquisition process while noting discrepancies in some claimed structures within the acquired 1/6 kilometer portions of land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court examined land acquisition cases (LAOP Nos. 148-156/2026) under the Indian Penal Code, 1871, Section 1, filed in Tiruvallur district on March 25, 2026. The Principal District and Sessions Judge analyzed the acquisition of land parcels NH 205 and SH 58 for public road construction, examining witness testimonies regarding land measurements, existing structures (hotels, educational institutions, commercial establishments), and compliance with land acquisition procedures. The judgment validates the acquisition process while noting discrepancies in some claimed structures within the acquired 1/6 kilometer portions of land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts