K.R.M. Kumaragam Chits (P) ltd., Rep by R. Pratheep kumar vs Adhisesha Rao — 81/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3)(a). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNTR010005062026
Filing Number
360/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
81/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K.R.M. Kumaragam Chits (P) ltd., Rep by R. Pratheep kumar
Adv. S. Balasubramanian
Respondent(s)
-
1.Adhisesha Rao
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The court suspended the six-month simple imprisonment sentence imposed on R. Pratheep Kumar (Managing Director) pending disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 81/2026. The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for cheque dishonor and directed to pay Rs. 5,21,522 compensation. As a condition, the petitioner must deposit 20% of the compensation amount (approximately Rs. 1,04,304) before the Trial Court within 60 days, failing which the suspension order stands automatically cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 81/2026
Summary: The court suspended the six-month simple imprisonment sentence imposed on R. Pratheep Kumar (Managing Director) pending disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 81/2026. The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for cheque dishonor and directed to pay Rs. 5,21,522 compensation. As a condition, the petitioner must deposit 20% of the compensation amount (approximately Rs. 1,04,304) before the Trial Court within 60 days, failing which the suspension order stands automatically cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts